Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Lawsuit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lawsuit. Show all posts

Thursday, February 15, 2018

Should Christians Sue for Personal Injuries?


It's October 29, 2012. You and your family heeded government warnings and evacuated your home on the South shore of Long Island, New York. Hurricane Sandy is ravaging the coast, and you can do nothing but wait for it to end.

The next day you return to your home, hoping it is still standing. As you enter the front door, you initially notice that the floor is covered with sand and debris. Water stains mark each wall, parallel to the ground at about three feet high. Everything on your first floor is destroyed, along with major damage to your home's exterior. Your cars are totaled. 

But, you are a Christian, and you keep things in their proper perspective. You think, "Thank God that my family is OK", and then, "Thank God that I have insurance!" You call your insurance company to make a claim, knowing that at least you won't suffer a major financial setback. 

Is this Wrong? 

What were your first thoughts when reading the above story? Did you think it is a sin to make an insurance claim? Did you think, "Christians should stay out of court"? Did the above story conjure thoughts of something dishonest or dubious? No? 

Then why do many Christians have these thoughts when faced with making a personal injury claim? The answer is multifaceted, but I believe predominantly stems firstly from a misinterpretation of scripture and secondly from marketing by insurance companies.

What is the Distinction?

It is perplexing that the same Christians who would unhesitantly pursue a property damage claim, refuse to make a personal injury claim. A comparison of a property damage claim and personal injury claim will reveal little distinction. Both cases begin as a claim and may end up in court. Both cases are paid out by billion dollar insurance companies, whose business is to sell insurance and pay claims. Also, neither claim will be paid personally by an individual involved in a lawsuit. Neither case will take money out of an individuals pocket nor take a family's house away.

The belief that it might be a sin or somehow displeasing to God to bring a personal injury lawsuit makes sense on the surface, because Christians are supposed to be "forgiving" and not seek revenge as "Vengeance is mine, says the Lord." Christians who accept this superficial rationale allow themselves to be twice victimized; first by the injury, and second by a misapplication of scripture. 

So why is there such a stigma on Christian personal injury lawsuits? 

Did Paul Say Don't Go to Court? 

Perhaps the most often cited scripture against Christians using the courts is 1 Corinthians 6. You may have heard that Christians should "stay out of court". A careful reading of this passage reveals that this interpretation is in error. 1 Corinthians 6:1-2 states:

If any of you has a dispute with another, do you dare to take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the Lord’s people? Or do you not know that the Lord’s people will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? (1 Corinthians 6:1-2 Emphasis added)

Paul specifically mentions "trivial" cases. This statement about trivial cases is the backdrop for 1 Corinthians 6. Paul is pleading with the Corinthians to keep their trivial matters out of court. This is not a blanket prohibition against using the court system. Also, an injury to one's body is never trivial! In fact, your body, as the Temple of the Holy Spirit and made in the image of God, is more infinitely valuable than any property and infinitely more deserving of protections offered by society.

Disputes Against a Brother

Paul goes on to state:

Is it possible that there is nobody among you wise enough to judge a dispute between believers? (1 Corinthians 6:5b emphasis added)

1 Corinthians 6 is clearly written for disputes amongst believers. It does not state that a believer should not sue a nonbeliever. This would make no sense since a non-believer would not submit to the "Lord's people" for adjudication of a matter. 

Roman Courts

Paul did not want Christians suing Christians where a Roman jail might be involved. Roman justice was very harsh and favored the rich and powerful. This is absolutely not the case in the modern day personal injury case. The injured party is never in the superior position, as the insurance companies have an inexhaustible supply of money and thousands of attorneys on their side. 

Modern civil disputes, specifically for serious personal injuries must use the courts as there is no other way to proceed. A modern day lawsuit is nothing more than a dispute resolution system provided for by your tax dollars to uphold the rule of law. Civil lawsuits protect society by acting as a deterrence to bad conduct. To protect people, the government has set up a civil court system whereby private citizens can resolve disputes with other private citizens and insurance companies when they have a significant injury inflicted upon them. In failing to pursue a personal injury claim, one may unwittingly permit the offending party to inflict injury on other members of the public. 

This brings to mind a recent case handled by my office. My client, I'll call him Tom, was biking, when a woman in a car ran a stop sign and collided with Tom. He landed about 12 feet away and sustained serious injuries. The defendant in this case then fled the scene of the accident, but only after she stopped, saw exactly what she had done, and considered her options. We brought a lawsuit which not only compensated our client for his injuries, but also let the defendant's insurance company know what she did. This served to protect the public in that the defendant will likely have to carry more insurance in the future, and hopefully will more carefully consider her conduct when driving. 

Old Testament Insight

God has not only allowed personal injury lawsuits but he has actually ordained them in the Scriptures. In Exodus Chapters 21 and 22 God instructs Moses on the way personal injury claims are to be handled. So, God not only is not against injury lawsuits, in fact he believes they are important enough to set up a system to deal with them. 

Does this really have to do with Christianity?

While some Christians are quick to point to the Bible as a the reason why they will not bring a personal injury lawsuit, they may actually have been convinced by the insurance companies that it is wrong. For years, consumers have been inundated with propaganda from the insurance companies convincing them that every claim is illegitimate and that there is rampant fraud against the insurance companies. This is simply not true. This is actually just an attempt by insurance companies to minimize the number of claims that people make. It is a great business model for them - collect billions of dollars in premiums, and convince their customers that if they make a claim it is unscrupulous or fraudulent. 

Conclusion


Does God want you to forgive someone who injures you in an accident? Yes. Does God want you to go bankrupt, lose your home, and have your family destroyed because you can no longer work after a catastrophic accident? No. A careful reading of 1 Corinthians or the Bible as a whole does not lead to the conclusion that a Christian who is run down by a drunk driver and paralyzed should not make an insurance claim. 

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

HAVE YOU PURCHASED A RED BULL IN THE LAST 12 YEARS?


A class- action lawsuit accusing makers of Red Bull of false advertising has been settled for $13 million. Anyone who purchased a Red Bull between January 1, 2002 and October 3, 2014 is eligible to claim a piece of the settlement. If you purchased a Red Bull during that time, go to EnergyDrinkSettlement.com to file a claim. You will receive either $15 worth of Red Bull products or $10 cash. No proof of purchase is necessary.

The DEADLINE to file a claim is MARCH 2, 2015

While it is unlikely that anyone thought drinking Red Bull would literally lead to them growing wings, the advertising was deemed deceptive because claims that the drink increases performance, concentration, and reaction speed are false.

The suit  claimed that “Even though there is a lack of genuine scientific support for a claim that Red Bull branded energy drinks provide any more benefit to a consumer than a cup of coffee, the Red Bull defendants persistently and pervasively market their product as a superior source of ‘energy’ worthy of premium price over a cup of coffee or other sources of caffeine.”

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

RECALL ALERT: Gree Dehumidifiers Recalled Due To Fire Hazard (165 reported incidents)

gree dehumidifier recall - injuries reported - lawsuit - recall
Dehumidifiers made by Gree Electric Appliances of China have been recalled due to serious fire and burn hazards. The recalled models are sold under the brand names Danby, De’Longhi, Fedders, Fellini, Frigidaire, Gree, Kenmore, Norpole, Premiere, Seabreeze, SoleusAir and SuperClima.

The dehumidifiers can overheat, smoke, and catch fire. There have been 165 reported incidents, including 46 fires, causing $2.15 million in property damage.

Tuesday, May 20, 2014

MORE Kugel Mesh Lawsuits....severe injuries reported


Bard Composix Kugel Mesh Patches have been recalled several times over safety issues caused by product defects. The patches, which are used to treat ventral hernias, contain flexible rings that allow large patches to be folded for insertion through small incisions. Once the patch is in position within the abdominal cavity, the ring pops open allowing the patch to be fastened flatly in place. However, the Food and Drug Administration has received numerous reports of defective recoil rings breaking and exposing jagged, sharp edges. These sharp edges can cause serious internal injuries.
If you or a loved one has suffered the serious side effects of a defective Bard Composix Kugel Mesh Patch, please contact the experienced defective medical device attorneys at Buttafuoco & Associates today for a complimentary consultation who can help you recover the compensation you may be due.

Potential Injuries

When a Bard Composix Kugel Mesh Patch malfunctions, serious internal injuries can occur. Some of the injuries caused by malfunctioning Kugel Mesh Patches include:
  • Intense abdominal pain
  • Bowel perforation
  • Intestinal fistulae, or abnormal passages between intestines
If you have been implanted with a Bard Composix Kugel Mesh Patch and are experiencing symptoms such as fever, persistent abdominal pain, tenderness, or other unusual abdominal symptoms, seek professional medical help immediately.

Recalled Bard Composix Kugel Mesh Patches

The following are the Bard Composix Kugel Mesh Patches affected by the recall:
  • Composix Kugel Extra Large Oval (7.7" x 9.7") Product code: 0010208
  • Composix Kugel Extra Large Oval (8.7" x 10.7") Product code: 0010206
  • Composix Kugel Extra Large Oval (10.8" x 13.7") Product code: 0010207
  • Composix Kugel Large Oval (5.4" x 7") Product code: 0010202
  • Composix Kugel Oval (6.3" x 12.3") Product code: 0010209
  • Composix Kugel Large Circle (4.5" in diameter) Product code: 0010204

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Sketcher's Shape-Ups a Real Let-Down. Can cause serious injury.

Have you suffered an injury while wearing Skechers Shape-Ups toning shoes?  Backed by celebrity endorsements by the likes of Kim Kardashian and former NFL quarterback Joe Montana, many consumers were easily led to believe the claims that the specialty sneakers can help wearers get in shape without having to step foot in a gym. 

Unfortunately, it is now clear that not only will these unusual shoes not deliver on the exercise promises but using them could lead to injury.  In fact medical professionals have recently issued warnings that toning shoes like Skechers Shape-Ups can result in a serious foot or leg injuries including:
  •     Hip fractures:  broken, bruised.
  •     Leg InjuriesStrains and Sprains, Fractures, Dislocation, Joint Injuries, Shin Splints, Tendonitis, and Nerve Damage.
  •     Ankle and foot fractures:  Stress Fractures, Fallen Arches, Hammer Toe, Turf Toe, Inflammation of the Forefoot, Plantar Fasciitis, and Joint Displacement.
  •     Wrist injuries:  fractured, tears.
  •     Head injuries: Coma, Concussion, Hematomas, Brain Damage, Hemorrhage, Skull Fracture, Contusions and Blood Clots.
  •     Joint injuries
  •     Tendon and ligament injuries
  •     Spinal cord injuries
Hundreds of Skechers Shape-Ups Lawsuits Have Been Filed by Consumers who Suffered Broken Bones, Tendon and Ligament Damage, Serious Head and Spinal Cord Injuries.  If you have suffered injured call our experienced injury lawyers right away at 1-800-669-4878.

These claims indicate that Skechers Shapes-Ups produce a substantial risk of causing chronic injuries and inducing falls due to their elevated and unstable rocker-bottom sole, which alters gait mechanics and creates instability. Among other things, the lawsuit points out that Consumer Reports documented as of May 2011 that Skechers has seen more reports of injuries or complaints than any other product in its database.

Additional, potential Skechers Toning Shoe injuries include:

  • Knee Injury
  • Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture (this toning shoe injury involves fractures in all three malleoli of the ankle)
  • Muscle Strains
  • Dislocated Hip
  • Ruptured Achilles Tendon
Due to strict filing deadlines, it is imperative you do not wait to contact a Skechers Shape-ups injury lawyer.  If you or someone you know has been injured in an accident while wearing a pair of Skechers Shape-Ups call the experienced Skechers Shape-Ups injury lawyers at Buttafuoco & Associates 1-800-669-4878.

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Drug Recall, Lawsuit: Birth Control Pills Containing Drospirenone (DRSP): YAZ Yasmin Ocella...


Our firm is now accepting cases involving YAZ, YASMIN, OCELLA (birth control pills). These drugs may be linked to Blood Clots, Pulmonary Embolism, Stroke, Heart Attack and even Death. If you or someone you know has been injured while taking one of these drugs call our offices today at 1-800-Now-Hurt.
What are YAZ, Yasmin, Ocella, Gianvi, Zarah, Loryna, Syeda, Beyaz, and Safyral?

YAZ, Yasmin, Ocella, Gianvi, Zarah, Loryna, Syeda, Beyaz, and Safyral are the only birth control pills, or oral contraceptives, to contain drospirenone (DRSP).

YAZ, Yasmin, Beyaz, and Safyral are manufactured by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Yasmin was originally made by Berlex Laboratories, which was acquired by Bayer in 2006.

Ocella is a generic version of Yasmin. Gianvi is a generic version of YAZ. The Ocella and Gianvi birth control pills are from Teva Pharmaceuticals and Barr Laboratories.

Zarah, another generic version of Yasmin, is made by Watson Pharmaceuticals.

Loryna, a generic version of YAZ, and Syeda, a generic version of Yasmin, are made and sold by Sandoz, Inc.

Each of these birth control pills contain ethinyl estradiol and the progestin drospirenone (DRSP). These DRSP oral contraceptives have also been associated with adverse side effects such as:

Daniel Buttafuoco
Senior Partner & Founder of Buttafuoco & Associates
Voted BEST LAWYER 5 years in a row!
Over $250 Million Recovered for our clients
www.1800NowHurt.com